Lawmakers Must Provide More Resources for Open Shop Construction Workers


By Brian Sampson

When state lawmakers return to Albany each year for the new legislative session, they are always asked by influential lobbyists and labor leaders about what they plan to accomplish for union workers, especially those in New York City’s construction industry.

While this is good for union construction workers, it inevitably leaves out thousands of construction workers in New York City who are not part of a union – and have no plans to join a union – but still require the ongoing support of state lawmakers. It’s time for that to change.

Here’s the reality for State Senator Ramos, the new Labor Committee Chair: When it comes to construction, New York City is no longer just a union town. This is due to significant changes across the industry that have compelled some of the city’s largest developers and contractors to shift to the open shop, which utilizes a non-unionized workforce to build with the level of safety, quality and efficiency required on each job.

A review of New York City Department of Buildings (DOB) pulled permits shows that the vast majority of private construction work across the city – approximately 80 percent – is now done by open shop workers. That equates to more than $15 billion of work for the non-union workforce.

Notably, open shop workers in New York City are also more locally based and racially diverse than their union counterparts. Industry surveys have shown that approximately three quarters of open shop workers across the city are people of color, and approximately three quarters of those workers are actually residents of the five boroughs. This is because many New Yorkers from underserved communities have entered the open shop in search of employment opportunities after being denied access to construction union apprenticeships.

The good news is that the open shop has now organically grown to provide thousands of these locally based workers with good jobs and a path to the middle class. Construction workers in the open shop make at least $20 per hour – even in entry-level positions – and can utilize crucial health insurance and 401k programs.

But the problem now is that policy discussions in the State Legislature have not yet evolved to reflect these changes. And when construction union officials lobby for legislation that is designed to benefit their members – many of whom live in New Jersey or Connecticut – they conveniently omit that such proposals generally work against the interests of locally based workers in the open shop.

Lawmakers must work to address this issue by stepping up to provide the additional funding and resources needed to sustain – and, when possible, expand – New York City’s open shop training and workforce development programs. Yes, folks already have the training they need for today’s job, but it’s always been understood on the union side of things that ongoing training opportunities play an important role in helping workers to advance their careers and open new pathways for success. And now that the industry has changed, those opportunities should be available to those in the open shop as well.

Additionally, the open shop workforce wants to see a reduction in legislation that prevents local hiring in the construction industry. Local for us is defined as taxpayers living in the five boroughs. We believe that construction sites should reflect the diversity of their surrounding communities and we know firsthand that the open shop has helped to drive this kind of progress across New York City.

Of course, we understand that construction union leaders will continue to have an influential presence in Albany. They can and should continue to fight for the interests of their members. But open shop workers deserve a voice too – and it’s the responsibility of our state lawmakers to listen up.

Brian Sampson is president of the Associated Builders and Contractors, Empire State Chapter.

As a full-service trade association, ABC offers a variety of information, tools and services to its members.


Union Requirement Inflates Cost of State Fair Bridge

By |May 23rd, 2019|Categories: News, Statewide|

A shortage of bids on the New York State Fairgrounds pedestrian bridge project will leave New Yorkers paying more, but getting less. When plans for the project were released with an accompanying project labor agreement (PLA), the playing field narrowed from 20 companies interested in the project to just two submitting bids, with the lowest bid coming in well in excess of $1 million over engineering estimates. Why the drastic decrease in competition and increase in costs? The answer can be found in three simple letters: PLA.

Another Voice: Benefits Add Hidden Costs to Prevailing Wage Projects

By |May 22nd, 2019|Categories: Statewide, Uncategorized|

Let’s not be fooled. Proponents of the expansion of prevailing wage are already doing great damage to taxpayers. They shouldn’t be allowed to ruin what little positive job growth we now have in New York.

Trade War: Find Out How The Tariffs Are Impacting New York Businesses and Consumers

By |May 17th, 2019|Categories: Federal Update, News, Statewide|

“What’s clear is that some contractors will have to deal with cost overruns that they can’t pass on to their customers,” said Brian Sampson, president of the Associated Builders & Contractors of New York. “But in most cases, the increased cost of the tariffs will be passed on to customers resulting in more expensive construction projects or higher costs for capital goods.”

First JCC Trades Training Class Graduates; Honored by Officials

By |May 13th, 2019|Categories: News, Statewide, Uncategorized|

The first class to complete the intensive 10-week, 40-hour construction training course offered by Jefferson Community College was celebrated at a recognition ceremony Friday at the Lewis County JCC Education Center.

Engineer Didn’t Prove That PLAs Save Money

By |April 24th, 2019|Categories: News, Statewide|

The PLA study, which cost Ogdensburg taxpayers $21,000, purports that with a series of false savings, labor consolidation and “management rights,” the project will save money. Yet no one challenged the study’s creator, Tim Seeler of Seeler Engineering, to positively prove those savings will be achieved. They also never asked him about the negative impact the lack of competition will have on the bidding process. They simply rubber-stamped the study and closed the door on local contractors and their employees.

Membership is available for general contractors, subcontractors, associates and suppliers.